• March 4, 2022 – SOUTHWEST ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING SERVICES, LTD. v INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY, ET. AL., US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Midland/Odessa Division
    • Client Representation: Industrial Accessories Company
    • Description: Testimony on project management, construction management, subcontractor field / site management, field labor productivity, damages
  • Jan 11, 2022 – AWS CONTRACTORS, LLC v SLS CO, LTD. AND HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, US District Court Bexar County, Texas, 150th Judicial District
    • Description: Testimony on Project Closeout, non-payment and defective work.
  • Dec 7-10. 2020 – US EcoGen, LLC v Duke Energy Florida, LLC – American Arbitration Association
    • Client Representation: Duke Energy Florida, LLC
    • Description: Testimony on project development, project management as well as planning and scheduling
  • Dec 7-10. 2020 – US EcoGen, LLC v Duke Energy Florida, LLC – American Arbitration Association
    • Client Representation: Duke Energy Florida, LLC
    • Description: Testimony on project development, project management as well as planning and scheduling
  • Dec. 12, 2019 – Appeal of Walbridge – ASBCA No. 61392 – Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals – Walbridge v Army Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES)
    • Client Representation: Army Air Force Exchange Service
    • Description: Testimony on project management, construction management, progress reporting, schedule and delay, contract time provisions and defective work
  • Nov. 21-22, 2019 – Appeal of WECC, Inc. – ASBCA No. 60949 – Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals – WECC, Inc. v Army Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES)
    • Client Representation: Army Air Force Exchange Service
    • Description: Testimony on schedule delay, contract administration and damages / quantum
  • Feb. 8-11, 2019 – Brahma Group, Inc. v Tenaris Bay City, Inc. – American Arbitration Association
    • Client Representation: Brahma Group Inc.
    • Description: Testimony on project management, construction management, changed work, and disruption / productivity
  • Sept. 18, 2008 – F. Rodgers Specialty Contractor v Sacramento Municipal Utility District – Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento
    • Client Representation: Sacramento Municipal Utility District
    • Description: Testimony on entitlement and quantum regarding insulation on power plant
  • March 19-23, 2007 – Appeal of ADT Construction Group, Inc. – ASBCA 55307 – Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
    • Client Representation: US Army Corps of Engineers
    • Description: Testimony on entitlement – delay, disruption, and contracting
  • 2003 – CENTEX/OMNIPLAN v AAFES – Mediation (ASBCA)
    • Client Representation: Army and Air Force Exchange Service
    • Description: Testimony on delay, disruption, changed work, construction means & methods, damages, construction defects, and acceleration
  • 2002-2003 – Kellogg Brown & Root v Commonwealth Chesapeake Company – American Arbitration Association
    • Client Representation: TECO (Tampa Electric Company) & Commonwealth Chesapeake Company
    • Description: Testimony on delay, disruption, changed work, construction means & methods, damages, construction defects, acceleration
  • 2001* – Local equipment supplier v. Neil Tyler & Sons – Duval County (FL) Civil Court
    • Client Representation: Neil Tyler & Sons
    • Description: Testimony on contracting and damages
  • 2000 – Appeal of Weekly Bros. Inc. – Interior Board of Contract Appeals 4183-200 through 4187-200
    • Client Representation: Weekly Bros Inc.
    • Description: Testimony on delay, disruption, defective specifications, acceleration, and damages
  • 2000 – Appeal of Fire Security – VA Board of Contract Appeals
    • Client Representation: Fire Security Systems
    • Description: Testimony on delay, disruption, and damages
  • 1996 – PG&E Pipeline Expansion Project Reasonableness Case, Application 94-09-056 – California Public Utility Commission
    • Client Representation: Pacific Gas & Electric
    • Description: Testimony on project management, cost, engineering management, schedule contracting
  • 1992* – Appeal by Electrical Contractor – Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
    • Client Representation: Army Air Force Exchange Service
    • Description: Testimony on changed Work, Delay – entitlement and quantum
  • 1984* – Selby Battersby v. Ingalls Shipbuilding – Philadelphia (PA) Civil Court*
    • Client Representation: Selby Battersby & Co.
    • Description: Testimony in delay, disruption, productivity, damages, construction means & methods

*Approximate or best information available